Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 23:53

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
What did Chandrashekhar Azad say about Hinduism during a podcast?
Thank you.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What would TERFs do if there weren't such a thing as being transgender? Who would be their target?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
New Pluto-Like Planet Discovered In Solar System — What To Know - Forbes
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Aut dolorem voluptates tempore maxime.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Crypto-crazy investors make South Korea the best-performing market in Asia - Financial Times
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.
Where in Maine are you most likely to get a dangerous tick bite? - The Portland Press Herald